Donations are essential to keep Write Out Loud going    

New feature - What I Do That's New

entry picture

What I Do That's New is a new bi-weekly feature column on Write Out Loud, in which guest poets explain their style.  Our intention is to highlight innovative ways of producing poetry and to act as a forum by which creative thinkers can share their ideas, and to encourage readers and writers to analyse their work and that of others.

We launch this feature on the 8th December with an article from Attila the Stockbroker.

Get involved

You’re unique.  Your writings or performances are different from those of other poets (but, this can also be a good thing!)  We want to hear about how you achieve those clever little things that you do.  If we took the panels off from your poetry and looked at the machinery inside, what would we see?

We are looking for articles from poets all over the world explaining aspects of technique that you incorporate into either the writing or performing of your work that people might not otherwise notice.

Poetry fits into the subject area of English Literature (although we also welcome articles by people who write their poetry in other languages as long as the texts of the articles are written in English or in both languages), so we are looking for innovations in subject matter (including new treatments and the ways in which you generate your emotional content and how you evaluate what you have written in order to check that it achieves its intentions), and also technical aspects of your writing such as structuring techniques (rhythmic devices that you have come up with, how you link your imagery etc.). 

However, poetry also fits into the arts.  Most (if not all) poems benefit from at least a little bit of performance technique ??" we are yet to encounter a poem that benefits from a flat monotone delivery. so tell us about your innovative performance techniques and how they help to disseminate meanings that are present in the words (or the role that it plays in the overall live experience of your poems).  What visual things do you do to improve the visual impact of sections of your poems when you lay them out on the page?

Articles should be short and succinct (around 500 words is ideal) and preferably contain excerpts from some of your poems to illustrate aspects of the text of the article.

Please send your articles to: dermot@writeoutloud.net

And finally...

I would especially like to appeal to the ladies...

(although my odd looking face and big ears possibly preclude this endeavour)

... I'd like to ask all the ladies who write poetry to lose some of their modesty and most of their inhibitions...

(wouldn't we all?)

... Come on, girls! Send me your articles - these strutting peacocks that we call male poets aren't the only ones whose work deserves deeper consideration.  Lets get some recognition for the ladies.

For ideas on how to set out your articles go here

◄ Adrian Mitchell 1932 to 2008

Harold Pinter 1930-2008 ►

Please consider supporting us

Donations from our supporters are essential to keep Write Out Loud going

Comments

<Deleted User> (5591)

Wed 24th Dec 2008 18:04

I have now edited that bit in order to clarify.

<Deleted User>

Wed 24th Dec 2008 17:36

Poetry fits into the subject area of English Literature (although we also welcome articles written in English by.......what do you mean by this?

<Deleted User> (5591)

Mon 17th Nov 2008 11:49

Thanks all for your interest in this feature. I would be delighted to receive your articles; you can send them to dermot@writeoutloud.net.

That includes you Sarah, of course you're good enough.

And, Freda, articles from women will be given equal consideration to those that I receive from ladies, girls and sheilas which in turn will be equal to any from chaps, gents, dudes, geezers and lads.
Note: any female writers wishing to describe their gender using offensive and misogynistic gangsta rap derived monikers will be instead be referred to by one of the above terms for the purposes of this feature.

<Deleted User> (5164)

Sun 16th Nov 2008 10:44

hey this sounds great
i dont think im good enouth though,

but im willing to lose my modisty a little :)

sez x

Profile image

Andy N

Sat 8th Nov 2008 12:08

Interesting idea, Dermont.. I'll have a think myself!

Pete Crompton

Fri 7th Nov 2008 20:50

Hi Dermot
Refreshing Idea.
I need to think about this.
How to respond.
I too will get back to you
I shall ponder upon what reveals if said panels are removed.
I once was of the opinion or belief that if I were a machine (the cogs perhaps Imply) then yes would reveal the mechanisms in the forms of brass cogs, counterweights, worm gears and the like.
I have since changed this opinion and fear that the workings are not mechanical or even binary but are organic, so the wheels are the shapes of cells and the whole system changes from one second to the next and unlike the symmetry of cogs and gears, unlike the predictable kinetic decay of clockwork, I fear my poetic process woudl be revealed as an entire organism. Its for this reason I find this concept you are exploring interesting. So many permutations so many inique people out there

but to share our secrets?
will they become disolved?
less potent
would we slay the dragon
kill the light if we let the real day inside?

Profile image

Freda Davis

Fri 7th Nov 2008 20:47

ps NOT GIRLS!!!!!

Profile image

Freda Davis

Fri 7th Nov 2008 20:40

Its a great idea Dermot, and I will give it some thought myself, but although it might seem strange to you, I prefer to be referred to as a woman, or woman poet, rather than a lady, which is an outmoded form indicating elite status which I have never aspired to and certainly have never achieved. That remains true even if some other female persons would like the term lady. I dont got a lot of modesty anyhow and have no problem with the idea of trying to big myself up. I'll get back to you.
Freda

If you wish to post a comment you must login.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Find out more Hide this message